<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Business Blog &#187; tax incentives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/category/tax-incentives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog</link>
	<description>Dedicated to bringing you news and information about the current Canadian business environment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New Claim Review Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/06/25/the-new-claim-review-manual/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/06/25/the-new-claim-review-manual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SR&ED News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changes to SR&ED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Along with the other changes that the CRA has been implementing over the past couple years, the Claim Review Manual has been updated. This is the manual that tells the CRA reviewers what processes they need to follow when reviewing an SR&#38;ED claim. This review manual is meant to make the review process more consistent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with the other changes that the CRA has been implementing over the past couple years, the Claim Review Manual has been updated. This is the manual that tells the CRA reviewers what processes they need to follow when reviewing an SR&amp;ED claim. This review manual is meant to make the review process more consistent from review to review, and from reviewer to reviewer. It sets out clear guidelines as to what is to happen in a review, and what kind of timeline the reviewer should be following when working on a claim. The manual is also supposed to increase the co-ordination between the technical and financial reviewers, and to increase the communication quality between the reviewer and you (the claimant).</p>
<p>The CRA&#8217;s website has laid out the <a href="http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/txcrdt/sred-rsde/pblctns/tchrvw-eng.html">steps to a review</a>, as listed in the CRA Review Manual. A brief overview follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>Preparing and planning:
<ul>
<li>Reviewing your claim</li>
<li>Identifying issues with your claim (ie &#8211; areas they are unsure can be considered SR&amp;ED)</li>
<li>Making first contact with you</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Conducting a site visit:
<ul>
<li>Preparing for the review (the reviewer will contact you by phone or letter to discuss when the review will happen)</li>
<li>Preliminary review work (interviewing any possible staff involved with the SR&#038;ED work, explaining the SR&#038;ED program, etc)</li>
<li>On-site review (tour of the facilities, interviewing staff involved in the SR&#038;ED work, reviewing supporting documentation)</li>
<li>Request for more information to be sent to the CRA reviewer</li>
<li>Communication of preliminary decisions (if possible, the reviewer will let you know what kind of results to expect from your claim submission)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Finalizing results:
<ul>
<li>SR&#038;ED review report (prepared by the CRA for you, to allow you to review it and provide any new information if you disagree with their assessment)</li>
<li>Finalization of technical and financial reports (these reports will be sent to you by mail, be delivered in a meeting, or discussed over the phone)</li>
<li>Dispute resolution (if you disagree with the CRA&#8217;s final report)</li>
<li>Appeals process</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/06/25/the-new-claim-review-manual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surviving Foreign Competition</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/25/surviving-foreign-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/25/surviving-foreign-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SR&ED News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saving thousands with sred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aggressive offshore competition isn’t new to us here. Let’s face it – it can be tough to survive when products similar to yours can be purchased for a fraction of the price from a company that doesn’t even operate in Canada. This can lead to a huge reduction in sales, can result in non-profit situations, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aggressive offshore competition isn’t new to us here. Let’s face it – it can be tough to survive when products similar to yours can be purchased for a fraction of the price from a company that doesn’t even operate in Canada. This can lead to a huge reduction in sales, can result in non-profit situations, and can cause difficulties for any company that is trying to remain competitive. In some cases, this causes business closures.</p>
<p>Businesses need to do what they can to offset those financial situations, and reclaiming costs for projects where you faced challenges can help your company become profitable again.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/">SR&#038;ED</a> (Scientific Research and Experimental Development) program can definitely assist in situations like this – a lot of expenses can build up through test runs, <a href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/08/what-about-failed-projects/">failed projects</a> and lengthy experimentation, and reclaiming some of these costs can make a very large difference in a company’s financial standing. The recovered costs can help offset the effect that offshore competition may have on your business, and can be used to invest back into your company.</p>
<p>Have you taken a look at how SR&#038;ED can help you remain competitive with offshore competition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/25/surviving-foreign-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming Changes to the SR&amp;ED Program</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/13/upcoming-changes-to-the-sred-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/13/upcoming-changes-to-the-sred-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SR&ED News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minister Blackburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sr&ed tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A press release has been issued about some upcoming changes to the SR&#38;ED program. A few points mentioned by Minister Blackburn today, while addressing the 13th Annual Tax Practitioner Information Session, relate to upcoming changes to the SR&#38;ED program: starting on April 1st, 2010, reviewers will be spending more time explaining the program (requirements, application [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A press release has been issued about some <a href="http://news.gc.ca/web/article-eng.do?m=/index&#038;nid=505399">upcoming changes to the SR&amp;ED program</a>. A few points mentioned by Minister Blackburn today, while addressing the 13th Annual Tax Practitioner Information Session, relate to upcoming changes to the SR&amp;ED program:</p>
<ul>
<li>starting on April 1st, 2010, reviewers will be spending more time explaining the program (requirements, application process, decisions made, etc) to claimants. Starting on the same date, if the CRA finds a company is missing eligible projects, they will let that company know sooner so they can resubmit their claim within the filing deadline.</li>
<li>beginning in July, the CRA will be posting quarterly reports on their website as to how long it takes for them to review an SR&#038;ED claim from start to finish.</li>
</ul>
<p>These changes are a result of some of the feedback they have been receiving about the SR&amp;ED program lately, especially in relation to the consistency of the program.</p>
<p>Minister Blackburn has also said that there will be more changes to the program in the future &ndash; we will be reporting on these changes as soon as we have word about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/13/upcoming-changes-to-the-sred-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What about failed projects?</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/08/what-about-failed-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/08/what-about-failed-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SR&ED News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saving thousands with sred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sr&ed tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often tell people that failed projects are embraced by the SR&#038;ED program, and sometimes it can be a little hard to understand exactly why. I mean, isn’t the program meant to promote innovation, and to encourage technological development? If so, then why are projects that don’t result in a more innovative product or process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often tell people that failed projects are embraced by the SR&#038;ED program, and sometimes it can be a little hard to understand exactly why. I mean, isn’t the program meant to promote innovation, and to encourage technological development? If so, then why are projects that don’t result in a more innovative product or process applicable for the SR&#038;ED program?</p>
<p>This goes back to the three criteria of the program: Technological Advancement, Technological Obstacles and Technical Content.</p>
<p>When looking at a failed project, you most likely faced a number of Technological Obstacles while working on it – these obstacles are anything that prevented you from getting to the final objective, so obviously in a failed project you faced a number of obstacles.</p>
<p>The technical content shows the systematic investigation that was done while trying to reach the final objective, which would be done for both failed and successful projects.</p>
<p>Lastly, your knowledge has been expanded in the instance of failed projects as well – in these instances, you now have the knowledge that there is no way that you have found to get to the final objective. </p>
<p>So yes, failed projects definitely qualify for the SR&#038;ED program, as long as they too fulfill the three criteria of the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/01/08/what-about-failed-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SR&amp;ED &amp; foreign-owned companies</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2009/11/24/sred-foreign-owned-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2009/11/24/sred-foreign-owned-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norman Nicol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SR&ED News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sr&ed tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian companies definitely have an advantage when it comes to research and development tax credits. Canada is rated among the Top G20 countries when it comes to Research and Development. The government encourages Canadian companies to do their research in Canada with tax credits and cash back incentives to remain manufacturing in Canada. Foreign companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian companies definitely have an advantage when it comes to research and development tax credits. Canada is rated among the Top G20 countries when it comes to Research and Development. The government encourages Canadian companies to do their research in Canada with tax credits and cash back incentives to remain manufacturing in Canada.</p>
<p>Foreign companies can benefit as well. The benefit to a foreign owned company can be the significant reduction or even elimination of their Canadian taxes owed, with the benefit of retaining the rights to the SR&#038;ED program.</p>
<p>Foreign companies become eligible when they become a subsidiary of a foreign parent and can claim 20% tax credits on qualifying SR&#038;ED activities. Another way to become eligible is to become a Canadian-controlled private corporation (CCPC), as long as an owner owns less than 50% of the company’s shares, so the majority of ownership is Canadian. Becoming a CCPC allows the company to claim 35% cash back on qualifying SR&#038;ED activities.</p>
<p>For more information check out this link: <a href="http://investincanada.gc.ca/eng/publications/rd-tax-credit-fact-sheet.aspx">http://investincanada.gc.ca/eng/publications/rd-tax-credit-fact-sheet.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2009/11/24/sred-foreign-owned-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
