<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Business Blog &#187; research and development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/category/research-and-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog</link>
	<description>Dedicated to bringing you news and information about the current Canadian business environment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Prototyping</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/07/29/prototyping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/07/29/prototyping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[new product development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend, I went away on holiday. Or rather, I went away for four days of intense, overwhelming-to-all-the-senses, crazy obsessive fangirlish journey to San Diego. San Diego ComicCon 2010 was happening, and I was determined to have my first experience of the four-day-long scifi/comic book/etc convention. And it was crazy, and awesome, and intense, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past weekend, I went away on holiday. Or rather, I went away for four days of intense, overwhelming-to-all-the-senses, crazy obsessive fangirlish journey to San Diego. San Diego ComicCon 2010 was happening, and I was determined to have my first experience of the four-day-long scifi/comic book/etc convention.</p>
<p>And it was crazy, and awesome, and intense, and all kinds of brilliant.</p>
<p>One of the most exciting parts was walking around the exhibition floor, seeing all the different toy and collectible manufacturers with new products that they are bringing out in the near future. Some of these items will be available in the upcoming year, but some of them are just preliminary prototypes that the companies will be modifying and improving on before bringing out the finished products.</p>
<p>The process for manufacturing toys and collectibles, if you look at the basic steps, isn&#8217;t too different than manufacturing anything else. And having prototypes can be a great benefit to your Scientific Research and Experimental Development claim.</p>
<p>Developing a prototype is a part of the iterative process that SR&#038;ED projects typically follow &#8211; design, prototype, testing, redesign, prototype, testing, and so on, until the final objective is reached. By keeping these prototypes that you have made, you have evidence for the CRA (should a review occur) that there was systematic investigation and experimentation done during your SR&#038;ED project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/07/29/prototyping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact or Fiction: My trade secrets aren&#8217;t safe!</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/06/14/fact-or-fiction-my-trade-secrets-arent-safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/06/14/fact-or-fiction-my-trade-secrets-arent-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fact or fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people get concerned when looking into the SR&#038;ED program about how safe their trade secrets are. One of the key components of the SR&#038;ED program is that you are faced with technological obstacles that don&#8217;t currently have any known methods to solving these problems &#8211; and in claiming for the SR&#038;ED program, you&#8217;re going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people get concerned when looking into the SR&#038;ED program about how safe their trade secrets are. One of the key components of the SR&#038;ED program is that you are faced with technological obstacles that don&#8217;t currently have any known methods to solving these problems &ndash; and in claiming for the SR&#038;ED program, you&#8217;re going to need to cover how you overcame these obstacles. It&#8217;s only natural that you are going to be worried that what you worked hard to discover could be easily made known to your competition.</p>
<p>But the reality of the situation is that your trade secrets are safe and are kept completely confidential.</p>
<p>First of all, the CRA only looks as deep as it needs to, in order to discover whether your SR&#038;ED projects qualify for the program &ndash; they only looks to see that there are technological obstacles, technological advancement and technical content. It isn&#8217;t always necessary for the CRA to look at the exact principles of your projects &ndash; when it is necessary, they maintain the strictest of confidentiality. In fact, the CRA has put rules and legislative precautions in place in order to protect your confidentiality.</p>
<p>If you are working with a consultant to prepare your SR&#038;ED claim, your consultant should also maintain the strictest confidentiality with your technologies and intellectual property. If you have any concerns that these may not be the case, a standard non-disclosure agreement should be signed to the respect.</p>
<p>So, it is indeed a myth that your trade secrets aren&#8217;t safe when claiming for the SR&#038;ED program, and this should not be a reason why you don&#8217;t consider filing for the SR&#038;ED program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/06/14/fact-or-fiction-my-trade-secrets-arent-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SR&amp;ED for Foreign-Owned Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/05/26/sred-for-foreign-owned-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/05/26/sred-for-foreign-owned-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR&ED program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sr&ed tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no denying that Canada has one of the best programs as far as funding for companies that perform R&#038;D goes. And while it is promoted frequently for Canadian Controlled Private Corporations, there are many other companies that can take advantage of this program. Take, for instance, an American-owned company that has a branch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no denying that Canada has one of the best programs as far as funding for companies that perform R&#038;D goes. And while it is promoted frequently for Canadian Controlled Private Corporations, there are many other companies that can take advantage of this program.</p>
<p>Take, for instance, an American-owned company that has a branch in Canada. This Canadian branch manufactures custom products for its customers, and regularly has to work through technological obstacles to create the final product that was required.</p>
<p>Because this American-owned company has a branch that operates in Canada, and pays taxes to the Canadian government, this foreign-owned company <strong>would</strong> be eligible for the <a href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/sred-information.php">Scientific Research and Experimental Development</a> program. Unlike privately-owned businesses, however, this foreign-owned company would be eligible to receive <strong>20%</strong> of their claim in the form of tax credits. These tax credits can be applied retrospectively ten years, or can be applied forward three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/05/26/sred-for-foreign-owned-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software: Who Can Claim for SR&amp;ED?</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/05/05/software-who-can-claim-for-sred/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/05/05/software-who-can-claim-for-sred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#8217;ve gotten your system running with a new piece of software &#8211; whether it&#8217;s to help run part of your machinery, or whether it&#8217;s to help run one of your processes more efficiently &#8211; and you want to include it in your SR&#38;ED claim. Question is, is it eligible? That all depends on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;ve gotten your system running with a new piece of software &#8211; whether it&#8217;s to help run part of your machinery, or whether it&#8217;s to help run one of your processes more efficiently &#8211; and you want to include it in your SR&amp;ED claim. Question is, is it eligible?</p>
<p>That all depends on the situation and how you got the software.</p>
<p>Did you buy it from the store and install it without any major difficulties? If so, it isn&#8217;t eligible for the SR&amp;ED program.</p>
<p>Did you contract out to someone to develop it for you, or did you develop it in-house? In that case, it may be eligible for the SR&#038;ED program. This is going to depend on a few factors &#8211; whether there were any technological obstacles that were faced, who the owner of the intellectual property is, and whether the person doing the development knows the IT industry (ie &#8211; a computer software engineer).</p>
<p>IT is one of the hardest industries to determine your own eligibility for the SR&amp;ED program. We encourage you to <a href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/contact-northbridge.php">contact us</a> to set up a meeting to see whether your IT project can be claimed for through the SR&amp;ED program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/05/05/software-who-can-claim-for-sred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada gets D for innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/02/03/canada-gets-d-for-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/02/03/canada-gets-d-for-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference Board of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conference Board of Canada issued a report on Tuesday on the state of Canada&#8217;s innovative abilities. Unfortunately, although we have the world&#8217;s best R&#038;D funding program, we do not seem to rank very well on the global scale of taking the innovation we do and profiting from it. In fact, we ranked &#8220;14th among [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Conference Board of Canada issued a report on Tuesday on the state of Canada&#8217;s innovative abilities. Unfortunately, although we have the world&#8217;s best R&#038;D funding program, we do not seem to rank very well on the global scale of taking the innovation we do and profiting from it. In fact, we ranked &#8220;14th among 17 industrialized nations for its ability to turn knowledge into money-making products and services.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of the sources of the problem suggested is that Canadian companies feel insecure about purchasing innovative products from other Canadian companies &ndash; and if a company cannot sell its products to other Canadian companies, then global companies start to question the value of the products.</p>
<p>Another source of the problem that is suggested is that Canada exports raw materials to be processed elsewhere instead of processing it here ourselves.</p>
<p>The report is not all bad news, however. It has been suggested that biofuels is an industry where Canada could become a leader.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.globaltv.com/money/Canada+gets+innovation+Conference+Board/2513069/story.html">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2010/02/03/canada-gets-d-for-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
